On 02/24/2015 09:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:44:01AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: >> This driver is used on new Xilinx ZynqMP SoC. > > Why does this have an architecture dependence at all? Let me push this to my repo and run Fenguang's system on it if there is any build error on others architectures. I expect that this could be sufficient test, right? Thanks, Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64
- From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:23:29 +0100
- Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 62.221.5.235) smtp.mailfrom=michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx; kernel.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
- In-reply-to: <20150224080807.GS6236@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64
- References:
- [PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64
- From: Michal Simek
- Re: [PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64
- From: Mark Brown
- [PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64
- Next by Date: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: clarify what driver can do with message->status
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64
- Index(es):
 |