Hi Mark, On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 10:46:06AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 02:45:13PM +0200, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: > > > +static int dln2_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master, > > + struct spi_message *msg) > > It's a bit sad not to do transfer_one() but it's reasonable not to > because of the fun way /CS is being set. My first attempts were with transfer_one()/set_cs() until I realized, using an oscilloscope, that DLN2 automatically toggles the /CS during read/write operations and that DLN2_SPI_SET_SS only instructs device which CS pins to toggle... :/ > > > + ret = dln2_spi_get_speed_range(dln2, > > + &master->min_speed_hz, > > + &master->max_speed_hz); > > Strange indentation here. I did some last minute function renaming and forgot to re-indent. Will fix in v2. > > > +static int dln2_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > +{ > > + struct spi_master *master = spi_master_get(platform_get_drvdata(pdev)); > > + struct dln2_spi *dln2 = spi_master_get_devdata(master); > > + > > + if (dln2_spi_enable(dln2, false) < 0) > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to disable SPI module\n"); > > + > > + spi_master_put(master); > > You shouldn't need this _put(), it's defeating the purpose of having the > devm_ registration. Agreed! I used spi-rockchip.c as a template and I took it for granted. I'll remove this line in v2. And, if you think it's worth it, I can send a separate patch for spi-rockchip.c too. thanks, laurentiu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html