On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 09:14:35AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: >> Thanks for the reply. It looks like you are also the maintainer of spidev. >> In this case, could you please help to confirm that you expect spidev to use >> separate buffers for TX and RX? If so, I can go ahead and make the change in >> spidev. > > Yes, that would be my expectation for maximum robustness (or if it is > going to use one buffer it explicitly maps it for mixed use but I'd > expect that to be asking for trouble). Having two separate buffers avoids false successes when running "spidev_test --loop" on a buggy SPI master driver. Been there, done that ;-) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html