On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:26:40AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 at 09:17:59 AM, Robin Gong wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:07:22AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > On Saturday, August 23, 2014 at 02:13:55 AM, Robin Gong wrote: > > > > After enable DMA > > > > > > Please also add a commit message which describes the change, not only > > > some test results. > > > > > > [...] > > > > Ok, I will enrich it in next version. > > > > > > @@ -911,6 +1194,13 @@ static int spi_imx_probe(struct platform_device > > > > *pdev) goto out_put_per; > > > > > > > > spi_imx->spi_clk = clk_get_rate(spi_imx->clk_per); > > > > > > > > + /* > > > > + * Only validated on i.mx6 now, can remove the constrain if validated > > > > on + * other chips. > > > > + */ > > > > > > Given that the check below tests for imx51_ecspi_devtype_data ... does > > > that mean, that this code was never tested on MX51 and MX53, yet will be > > > enabled for those chips and might possibly break them ? > > > > Yes, because there is no available mx51 mx53 boards in my hands. But I > > think it won't bring too much trouble, since they share the same IP. > > No, the patch won't break current MX51 and MX53, because they didn't enable > > dma in dts setting,and they will keep use pio mode. > > Thanks for clearing this up, this was the important piece of information for me. > Please put it into the commit message. > Okay. Thanks for your reminding. > Best regards, > Marek Vasut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html