On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:11:29PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote: > On Friday 11 April 2014, 17:22:23 wrote Mark Brown: > > Converting to use the core transfer_one_message() would also help, we > > could then return from the transfer function and have the core implement > > the wait for the completion. > Mh, this driver already uses that. > > master->transfer_one_message = atmel_spi_transfer_one_message; > Or did you mean transfer_one? Yes, I mean the driver should use the core version of transfer_one_message() rather than providing its own which in turn means that it has to provide a transfer_one() function.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
