On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 09:45:29AM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > The delay between deassertion and re-assertion looks good, too. > It allows for propagation of the change through the hardware. > Those who need longer pauses still can construct individual > messages. There's probably no need to change the boolean > "cs_change" into a numerical "deassertion pause length" spec. I'm more worried about board specific requirements to increase the delay there than I am about devices, or about devices that wish to lower the delay. But I do think it's likely to be OK in practice, someone who actually runs into problems can worry about enhancements.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
