2014-02-28 1:09 GMT+08:00 Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 02/26/2014 06:05 PM, Axel Lin wrote: >> This ensures to use spi_device's bits_per_word setting when t->bits_per_word is >> not set. This looks like a bug introduced by commit 24778be20f8 >> "spi: convert drivers to use bits_per_word_mask". > > I thought the SPI core already contained this kind of logic, so that > drivers could rely on t->bits_per_word always being set up? Yes, this: Hi Stephen, Yes, you are right and thanks for the review. Regards, Axel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html