Hi Laurent, On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> And if we remove "renesas,sh-msiof", we should probably remove >> "renesas,sh-mobile-msiof", too, as there are no current users, and it also >> assumes the same MSIOF implementation? > > I'm not too familiar with the MSIOF hardware, can "renesas,sh-mobile-msiof" be > used as a fallback for the currently support ARM SoCs ? r8a73a4/APE6: No r8a7740/A1: Maybe (not 100% clear to me from the datasheet) r8a7790/R-Car H2: No r8a7791/R-Car M2: No sh7372/AP4: No information sh73a0/AG5: No information Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html