于 2014年02月28日 14:13, Mark Brown 写道: > little while after the last use has finished? That's a little more > involved though and would still need this due to runtime PM being yes. we can use the runtime PM too. but i am not sure which one is _better_. the runtime PM? or the current way? thanks Huang Shijie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-imx: spi_imx_remove: do not disable disabled clocks
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-imx: spi_imx_remove: do not disable disabled clocks
- From: Huang Shijie <b32955@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:28:04 +0800
- In-reply-to: <20140228061344.GD29849@sirena.org.uk>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-imx: spi_imx_remove: do not disable disabled clocks
- From: Huang Shijie
- [PATCH v2] spi: spi-imx: spi_imx_remove: do not disable disabled clocks
- From: Philippe De Muyter
- Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-imx: spi_imx_remove: do not disable disabled clocks
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-imx: spi_imx_remove: do not disable disabled clocks
- From: Huang Shijie
- Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-imx: spi_imx_remove: do not disable disabled clocks
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-imx: spi_imx_remove: do not disable disabled clocks
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3] spi: core: Validate length of the transfers in message
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] spi: sh-msiof: Add support for R-Car H2 and M2
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-imx: spi_imx_remove: do not disable disabled clocks
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-imx: spi_imx_remove: do not disable disabled clocks
- Index(es):
 |