Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > i18n files are currently encoded in latin1 (aka iso-8859-1), which poses > problem for various languages whose characters cannot be encoded that > way. We could duplicate the i18n entries, one in latin1 and one in > utf-8, but it will probably be much simpler to just switch the i18n > files to utf-8 and be done? Would anybody be against this? I'm in support, especially if you can run iconv or a similar tool to convert the existing translations without loss.
