Here's the files in the folder, when I ran sudo dpkg -i espeak-ng It came back that it cannot find the package espeak-ng Here are the files in the folder where I ran the command: graphic 835 patches 14 603 17 920 2021-09-09 18:34 drwxr-xr-x graphic 835 source 36 1 024 2019-12-02 19:42 drwxr-xr-x graphic 835 tests 58 766 59 392 2019-12-02 19:42 drwxr-xr-x graphic 540 changelog 17 992 18 432 2021-09-09 18:34 -rw-r--r-- graphic 540 compat 2 512 2021-09-09 18:32 -rw-r--r-- graphic 540 control 4 968 5 120 2021-09-09 18:32 -rw-r--r-- graphic 540 copyright 3 877 4 096 2019-12-02 19:42 -rw-r--r-- graphic 540 docs 27 512 2019-12-02 19:42 -rw-r--r-- graphic 540 espeak-ng-data.install 41 512 2019-12-02 19:42 -rw-r--r-- graphic 540 espeak-ng-espeak.install 16 512 2019-12-02 19:42 -rw-r--r-- graphic 540 espeak-ng.doc-base 353 512 2019-12-02 19:42 -rw-r--r-- graphic 540 espeak-ng.install 34 512 2019-12-02 19:42 -rw-r--r-- graphic 540 libespeak-ng-dev.install 97 512 2019-12-02 19:42 -rw-r--r-- graphic 540 libespeak-ng-libespeak-... 20 512 2019-12-02 19:42 -rw-r--r-- graphic 540 libespeak-ng-libespeak-... 200 512 2019-12-02 19:42 -rwxr-xr-x graphic 540 libespeak-ng-libespeak... 115 512 2019-12-02 19:42 -rwxr-xr-x graphic 540 libespeak-ng1.install 29 512 2019-12-02 19:42 -rw-r--r-- graphic 540 rules 840 1 024 2021-09-09 18:32 -rwxr-xr-x graphic 564 watch 113 512 2021-09-09 18:32 -rw-r--r-- graphic 257 graphic 756 1 / 20 object(s) selected 113 113 2021-09-09 18:32:40 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jude DaShiell" <jdashiel@xxxxxxxxx> To: "K0LNY_Glenn" <glenn@ervin.email>; "Gregory Nowak" <greg@xxxxxxxxx>; <speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2022 10:09 AM Subject: Re: hopefully some help with AntiX sudo dpkg -i espeak-ng then hit tab if in the same directory as the archive. Once done, try sysctl enable espeak then reboot. Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940) . On Sat, 27 Aug 2022, K0LNY_Glenn wrote: > Well I found espeak-ng for Debian Buster here: > https://packages.debian.org/buster/espeak-ng > The file I downloaded was: > espeak-ng_1.49.2+dfsg-8+deb10u1.debian.tar.xz > Looking in the archive, there are some .install files, but I didn't find > any > .sh files, so I don't know which file to use to get espeak installed on > this > system. > Or if there is a .deb for RhVoice, that would work too, but did I download > the wrong espeak-ng file for installing it? > Thanks. > > Glenn > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "K0LNY_Glenn" <glenn@ervin.email> > To: "Jude DaShiell" <jdashiel@xxxxxxxxx>; "Gregory Nowak" > <greg@xxxxxxxxx>; > <speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2022 9:46 AM > Subject: Re: hopefully some help with AntiX > > > Well I ran check-dependencies.py and it gave a couple mysterious errors, > but > it didn't help. > I ran install.sh again. > I ran sudo fenrir and again it only gave me the startup tone. > It acts like there is no TTS for it to use. > Glenn > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jude DaShiell" <jdashiel@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "K0LNY_Glenn" <glenn@ervin.email>; "Gregory Nowak" <greg@xxxxxxxxx>; > <speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2022 9:55 PM > Subject: Re: hopefully some help with AntiX > > > Also sysctl enable fenrir.service or is it fenrirscreenreader.service then > sysctl start fenrir.service or sysctl start fenrirscreenreader.service. > If a service is missing systemd will let you know about it. > > > Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." > -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940) > > . > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, K0LNY_Glenn wrote: > > > Well I ran install.sh on the system, and pressed enter where it said to > > proceed, and it said was finished, and it said to type > > sudo fenrir > > to test it, and all I can get is the two-tone sound when fenrir starts, > > but > > no TTS. > > Should have that installed espeak or espeak-ng? > > Thanks. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jude DaShiell" <jdashiel@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: "K0LNY_Glenn" <glenn@ervin.email>; "Gregory Nowak" <greg@xxxxxxxxx>; > > <speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2022 8:27 PM > > Subject: Re: hopefully some help with AntiX > > > > > > For now and not forever, why not do apt purge ufw? > > > > > > Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> > > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." > > -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940) > > > > . > > > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, K0LNY_Glenn wrote: > > > > > Then all 1000 ports show up in nmap as closed. > > > So it seems if I allow a port in ufw, it shows up as closed, but not > > > filtered. > > > So filtered means ufw is running, and if 22 gets allowed, it is not > > > filtered, but still closed. > > > Glenn > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Jude DaShiell" <jdashiel@xxxxxxxxx> > > > To: "K0LNY_Glenn" <glenn@ervin.email>; "Gregory Nowak" > > > <greg@xxxxxxxxx>; > > > <speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2022 7:12 PM > > > Subject: Re: hopefully some help with AntiX > > > > > > > > > What happens if ufw --disable is run then the offending computer gets > > > rebooted? > > > > > > Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> > > > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > > > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." > > > -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940) > > > > > > . > > > > > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, K0LNY_Glenn wrote: > > > > > > > I've considered that, and if I can get any port to open, I will > > > > gladly > > > > use > > > > telnet. > > > > Hell, if I could open all 1000 ports now, I would! > > > > Glenn > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Gregory Nowak" <greg@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > To: <speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2022 7:01 PM > > > > Subject: Re: hopefully some help with AntiX > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 02:06:13PM -0500, K0LNY_Glenn wrote: > > > > > On the antiX I did > > > > > sudo netcat -l 22 > > > > > and then on the pine 64, I did sudo nc 10.248.1.143 22 > > > > > and it does not seem to connect. > > > > > I wonder if it is because I am using 22 to get from my windows to > > > > > the > > > > > Pine64, in order to go linux to linux. > > > > > > > > Port 22 is a privileged port. You should consider using 1024 or > > > > higher. If the listening port is open on the firewall, the commands > > > > you gave above should connect. If you type something on the client > > > > side, you should see it typed on the antiX machine, and the other > > > > way > > > > round. This will however not give you a login terminal. To do that, > > > > you need something that handles logins to listen on your netcat. > > > > This > > > > isn't something I've done, so can't give you more directions here. > > > > If > > > > you don't care about the connection being secure, which you don't > > > > seem > > > > to, you might as well try: > > > > > > > > apt install telnetd > > > > > > > > and open tcp 23 on your firewall. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 04:12:28PM -0500, K0LNY_Glenn wrote: > > > > > Well I thought I'd try iptables again. > > > > > I finally got it to run without any errors, that long iptables > > > > > command > > > > > I > > > > > got > > > > > earlier. > > > > > But nmap still sees no ports open on that host. > > > > > Prior to running iptables, I tried to apt install it, and the > > > > > message > > > > > was > > > > > that I'm already running the latest. > > > > > So I needed to restart iptables with > > > > > sudo service iptables restart > > > > > and it can find no service iptables. > > > > > I retyped it several times to be sure there was no typos. > > > > > > > > This is to be expected, iptables is not a system service. > > > > > > > > > So I tried > > > > > sudo systemctl restart iptables > > > > > and the system cannot find systemctl > > > > > > > > Is antiX running sysvinit, openrc, or something else? This is > > > > something the antiX documentation should tell you. What does it use > > > > for PID1 or init? > > > > > > > > > question: > > > > > If I reboot, if the long iptables command worked, will it stick if > > > > > I > > > > > reboot? > > > > > > > > No. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 05:57:37PM -0500, K0LNY_Glenn wrote: > > > > > Well it seems ufw is there, but it must not be running > > > > > automatically, > > > > > but > > > > > it > > > > > does not fix the port problem. > > > > > I did > > > > > sudo ufw allow ssh > > > > > it said tcp port allowed > > > > > or something like that > > > > > so I checked on the other computer with nmap > > > > > 100 ports closed > > > > > So I did sudo ufw restart > > > > > and the other computer said 999 ports filtered tcp port 22 closed. > > > > > I've done iptables too, but that does not stay after a reboot. > > > > > if I do sudo ufw status > > > > > it shows tcp port 22 allow > > > > > but it does not stay from a reboot. > > > > > > > > You need to save the firewall configuration once you changed it for > > > > it > > > > to persist across reboots. I haven't used ufw, so you will need to > > > > read up on how to do that. > > > > > > > > If port tcp 22 shows up as not filtered but closed, then the port is > > > > open, but there is no ssh service running. > > > > > > > > Greg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
