Re: hopefully some help with AntiX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



See if rlogin is on that system, it's supposed to be a more secure flavor
of telnet without using ssh.


Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com>
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)

.

On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, K0LNY_Glenn wrote:

> Man, I thought that would work, but it said it cannot locate a package named
> telnetd
> Glenn
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gregory Nowak" <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "K0LNY_Glenn" <glenn@ervin.email>
> Cc: "Jude DaShiell" <jdashiel@xxxxxxxxx>; <speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2022 7:33 PM
> Subject: Re: hopefully some help with AntiX
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 07:18:17PM -0500, K0LNY_Glenn wrote:
> > Then all 1000 ports show up in nmap as closed.
> > So it seems if I allow a port in ufw, it shows up as closed, but not
> > filtered.
> > So filtered means ufw is running, and if 22 gets allowed, it is not
> > filtered, but still closed.
>
> If a port is filtered, ufw is running. If a port is closed, ufw isn't
> running, or is allowing that port through, but there is no service
> listening on that port.
>
> It seems you have figured out how to disable ufw, and how to get it to
> open ports. If
>
> apt install openssh-server
>
> doesn't work, see if
>
> apt install telnetd
>
> does.
>
> Greg
>
>
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux