dkim, dmark, and spf checks are now quite standard. Some inbound sites will bounce mail that doesn't check out with these protocols. Janina Kirk Reiser writes: > That's what I do for mail. I have postfix installed and then go back > and forth between alpine and mutt depending on the system on my LAN > I'm using. A while back I began having trouble with gmail accepting > mail so I had to install a dkim mail verifier to get around their > silliness. It works very well IMO and I don't know why anyone would > use anything else. I really like to control my own mail handling. > > Kirk > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote: > > > Not to be outdone, but here's an even further back question: > > > > What if I installed an MTA on my system, like exim or postfix? Would > > that be a workaround? At present each of my three email programs sends > > directly to smtp.gmail.com, and I have no MTA on my system at all. > > > > Chuck > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup -- Janina Sajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup
