Thanks. It seems relatively straightforward from here on. Job switch combined with an unexpectedly busy holiday period means that I haven't been able to work on this recently. Things will settle next week when I will be back on it. Merry Christmas and happy new year! Okash > On 20 Dec 2016, at 01:08, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Okash Khawaja, on Sun 18 Dec 2016 11:24:11 +0000, wrote: >> Now I see three items to address, listed below in no particular order. >> >> 1. Supplying major and minor dev numbers, instead of hardcoding. > > This could be a mere module parameter string that a function turns into > major/minor. Not a big deal :) > >> 2. Integrating the changes into speakup_dummy and testing it. > > Yep! > >> 3. Strategy for kernel patch. Do we try to have it accepted? Not sure if there >> is a standard way of addressing it. > > It will never be accepted before step 2. is done. In the end we'll want > to get it accepted, sure, but we have to make speakup able to use it > first, otherwise the kernel patch will be rejected. > > Thanks! > Samuel _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup
