If its masked, you can unmask it unless it says something about no keywords, and there is a way to fix that as well. But arch is pretty good and indeed less work than gentoo. Kyle <kyle4jesus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > According to covici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > # At least in gentoo, you get things the way you want, not imposed by > # some dev somewhere. To each his own. > > Perhaps, but I tried a Gentoo installation, and although I eventually > did get it to run in qemu, I wasn't able to get things the way I wanted > them. I wanted the latest GNOME, but found it hard masked, so I > couldn't install anyting other than I believe 2 versions earlier. I > found that Arch was far easier to install, but also gave me the latest > GNOME if I wanted it, with no hard mask, whatever that meant, and if I > didn't want GNOME, I didn't have to have it. I found Arch to be the > most flexible and customizable with the least amount of hassle, even > though Gentoo is almost completely source based, which would lead to > the logical assumption that Gentoo should have been more customizable > overall. > Sent from my gadget > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup
