Because they made some changes which causes a particular return code when trying to get the serial port, but if you make the change it still will work. Its a workaround because it does not really solve the problem, but it gets us by till we can really fix things. Tony Baechler <tony at baechler.net> wrote: > No, I haven't. Why should I? It works great on my 64-bit Linux with the > 2.6.32 kernel. I used it a couple of times today. I must say that Linux > is much faster at copying files to my SD cards. If you can give me some > idea why 32-bit kernel 3.2 wouldn't find the serial ports when 64-bit > kernel 2.6.32 does, I'm most interested. > > On 5/27/2013 6:40 PM, acollins at icsmail.net wrote: > > HiTony. Have you looked at /proc/ports to see if your serial ports > > are being registered? If not, have you looked to make sure you don't > > have a serial port module that needs to be loaded? Just a couple of > > thoughts. > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at linux-speakup.org > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici at ccs.covici.com
