Hi all,
Sadly, I must concur with all that has been said here, at least the
negative stuff. I couldn't get them to turn Speakup on in the Fedora
kernel, even though the modules are right there in staging. Happily,
there's an organization called RPM Fusion. They provide add on modules for
Fedora that the Fedora project won't include. They were happy to build the
Speakup modules for their staging package. I build Fedora 18 with the
stuff from RPM Fusion and can make it available to anyone who wants it.
Installation would require a kickstart script, or the dreaded sighted
assistance. I know that this doesn't help with RHEL, but since Fedora was
mentioned, I thought I'd chime in.
Hope this helps someone.
--
Bill in Denver
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013, Tony Baechler wrote:
> Umm, why? She only works with Fedora as I understand and I'm not even sure
> if the Speakup Modified Fedora is still current. It would be good if she
> could get her organization and the AFB involved though.
>
> No, I think the only way this will change is if at least a few people
> complain loudly to the ACB and lflegal.com. Even then, it could take years.
> I agree that LPI seems better, based on the books I've seen. I personally
> would be willing to support a movement to make RHEL accessible, but since I
> don't use it and don't have to, I'm not a good candidate to complain.
>
> For those of you living in California, the CCB is also a good choice. They
> are very strong and have taken on several big companies. Yes, the ACB and
> CCB require membership, but it isn't expensive and you can call first to see
> if they're interested in helping. http://ccbnet.org/
>
> On 3/29/2013 5:25 AM, Glenn wrote:
>> One person I would ask about this is:
>> Janina Sajka
>> Her address is:
>> janina at rednote.net
>> Glenn
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at linux-speakup.org
> http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
