Irssi already does that. What I am working on is better channel and message level control for what you hear, not what is displayed. For instance, with this script, you will be able to monitor more than one channel at once, without having to pin windows to each other, eg. /join -window #channel You will also have the ability to turn off windows, disable speech entirely without turning off speakup, have long url's shortened *ever seen an ebay link?) and a few other nifty things. You ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Hallenbeck" <chuckh@xxxxxxxx> To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup at linux-speakup.org> Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 12:02 PM Subject: Re: some semi technical questions > On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Rob Hudson wrote: > >> Would it be better to have the scripts send messages to something like >> speech-dispatcher, or can messages be queued and sent directly to speakup >> itself? > > Why not just have your script send messages to the screen and let the > screen reader handle them? > > > > > -- > > Chuck, now in Ghent: (northeast of Hudson on the Hudson) > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at linux-speakup.org > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup
