I would think not, William, since it makes it easier for newbees to get espeakup. Gene >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 06:28:09PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> William Hubbs, le Wed 23 Sep 2009 11:21:04 -0500, a ?crit : >> > I'm also concerned about this, because there is no espeakup 3.1.3. The >> > latest version of espeakup which is released is 0.71. >> >> But they are in the same upstream package, thus the same version. > > No, espeakup is a separate upstream package at version 0.71. >The only reason it is in the "contrib" directory of speakup is that Kirk >suggested this as an easy way to distribute espeakup. > > The home page for espeakup is on github at > http://www.github.com/williamh/espeakup, and the tarball of the current > release is currently hosted on linux-speakup.org and distributed in the > contrib directory of speakup. > > Should I remove it from the contrib directory to eliminate confusion? > > Thanks, > > William >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) > >iEYEARECAAYFAkq6VjQACgkQblQW9DDEZTjvcgCfV4FcHKXhz3ogO6HH6As3gy+s >PMAAoLbtt8+jLWQaFF1gpNsJn9NmBHhm >=J41v >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >_______________________________________________ >Speakup mailing list >Speakup at braille.uwo.ca >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
