-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 02:14:54AM -0400, luke wrote: > One potential problem with dd, is that there is no integrety checking. I > don't know if there is with partimage either, but with multiple gig > drives, you may run into circumstances where that would be a good thing to > have. There's no integrity checking in partimage, at least in the sense I think you're referring to. However, you could restore the backup with the --simulate flag passed to partimage, which would cause it to simulate restoring the backup. So far, I've never had an actual restoration of a backup with partimage go bad, after having the simulated restore go ok. Greg - -- web site: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org gpg public key: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org/pubkey.asc skype: gregn1 (authorization required, add me to your contacts list first) - -- Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjbLiAACgkQ7s9z/XlyUyDe2ACeLcUB3mQ6Dli8mjtRdWgEMBRk OMsAnRulJt104o/mvKY1ayUga4dM5PYW =XBlX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
