-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I personally use the stock sources from kernel.org without the debian patches, and I use kernel-package to build a debian package of the kernel, which I then install with dpkg -i. Yes, your observation regarding speakup is correct, you do need a configured kernel source tree on your system to build speakup from the git sources. Greg On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:14:47AM -0700, Steve Holmes wrote: > Hey, just curious. When updating to latest git-pull of speakup, do > most Deb users go with Debian's kernel source or do they use the > generic one from ftp.kernel.org? I'm about to update my copy of > speakup and even with 2.6.26, the install script in speakup appears to > need a kernel source tree. Is my observation correct here? > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > - -- web site: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org gpg public key: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org/pubkey.asc skype: gregn1 (authorization required, add me to your contacts list first) - -- Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkj8yDoACgkQ7s9z/XlyUyCcRwCggnwdlrX04eYpCTHYyjwj8i3L Ao4An1iuf/VsdTsO+xXyAE3lxpsdNmKU =u82o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
