Hi.
I don't remember any problems. Both packages use the same config file
structure, just exim-heavy has more options.
Kenny
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 05:17:05AM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
>
> Hi Kenny,
>
> I don't have any reason not to change to exim heavy, except I've never
> done it, and don't want to break anything. I installed sa-exim on this
> exim4 lite installation, and it does seem to invoke spamassassin as
> expected, but there seem to be lots of other configuration options that
> suggest heavy is a better bet.
>
> What should I expect if I upgrade? Is it straightforward? Same
> configuration files? The older I get, the more timid I become
>
> Chuck
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:32:36PM -0600, Kenny Hitt wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Unless it's recently changed, sa-exim requires exim-heavy. Is thare
> > reason why you don't want to switch to exim heavy?
> >
> > Kenny
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
> --
> The Moon is Waning Crescent (14% of Full)
> But you can get a few downloads from http://www.mhcable.com/~chuckh
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
