The reason for changing to recording to a wav first, is that you can use the player of your choice, so allowing you to use the output method of your choice (e.g. aplay for alsa, or I think play for oss), where as getting it to use the espeak output system, you are restricted to systems supported by portaudio (currently oss in portaudio v18). Also I had other reasons for doing this, the portaudio output with espeak did not work correctly on my desktop, when using speech-dispatcher, I was unable to get it to silence (seemed to be sound card dependent, as it was only the one sound card in my desktop, and also not present on my laptop). If using the espeak output system works for you, and you are happy with the limitation of OSS, then it could be very preferrable to missout writing to a wav. From Michael Whapples ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alastair Irving" <alastairirving19@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "'Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.'" <speakup at braille.uwo.ca> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:11 AM Subject: RE: eSpeak tip > Having installed the cvs version of speech dispatcher, there is a > definite deteriation in the responsiveness of espeak. I have eventually > reverted to the espeak.conf file that Michael originally sent to the > list. This is far more responsive since the text is spoken imediately > rather than saved as a wav. > > It appears that aplay always takes a short period of time to load, and > doesn't get killed imediately. What is the advantage of saving to wav > 1st? > > > Alastair Irving > e-mail (and MSN): alastairirving19 at hotmail.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca > [mailto:speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca] On Behalf Of Michael Whapples > Sent: 14 May 2006 17:38 > To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. > Subject: Re: eSpeak tip > > > When you say it won't go fast enough, do you mean that the words per > minute > is not great enough? If so, you could change the conversions in the > speech-dispatcher espeak conf file, espeak uses words per minute for its > > speed. > > Does play use alsa? I found that that alsa and speech-dispatcher doesn't > > always stop the speech immediately, I even found a delay in stopping > festival with speech-dispatcher when using alsa. I'm not sure it was > quite > as much as one second, but enough that it would still be speaking the > last > phrase whilst starting to start speak the next (e.g. when using screen > review keys in speakup moving from line to line, without waiting for > things > to finish, not present with oss as two sounds cannot play at the same > time). > It might be something to do with alsa, anyone know? > > From > Michael Whapples > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tyler Spivey" <tspivey at pcdesk.net> > To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca> > Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 8:24 PM > Subject: eSpeak tip > > >> I've found that if you change aplay to play in espeak-generic.conf, >> atleast for me with grml, it gets rid of the one-second pause when >> killing aplay. I like it so far, but it just can't go fast enough. >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > >
