-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 07:16:37 PM -0700, Steve Holmes wrote: > Hwew! What an earful:)! I'll keep this message asside for future > reference for sure. I had no idea that Speech Dispatcher was so > powerful. I admit, I haven't read the documentation as I have been > mainly interested in getting it to work with Speakup and that part seems > to be pretty good right now. This other configurability does sound like > it could be an interesting time. Dunno enough about it to see if I can > speed things up a bit but... Perhaps there could be a way to send ssip commands using /proc/speakup/synth_direct although a change may have to be made to speechd-up to support it. Something like that seems the easiest way to let userland scripts use the full power of speech-dispatcher without having to add lots of stuff to the speakup code. I've still got a working doubletalk here and don't use software speech much, so I may be totally off base, but just my $0.02. - -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan Thomas Stivers e-mail: stivers_t at tomass.dyndns.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEGtIf5JK61UXLur0RAznAAJ0U6esKUnb9WFrQwbakcylM1h6lQwCfQkmp NQ24r8omo9MlnlGMuL8pRPI= =fZfX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----