-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Before writing the script, I started speechd-up at highest priority, followed by manually starting speech-dispatcher and festival with highest priorities in regressive testing. I found that only giving highest priority to speechd-up made speech more fluid. I didn't try any other priority combinations, and from my point of view decreasing the priority of speech-dispatcher would be counter-intuitive when it came to more fluid speech. Ultimately, after writing the script, I found that the greatest cause of halting speech was festival, and discovered to my pleasant surprise, that flite has about the same voice quality as festival, but is much better than festival when it comes to system resources. Like I said, this is the setup that works for me, and you are free to modify the script if you don't like the way I did things. Greg On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:40:32AM -0700, Sean M McMahon wrote: > I thought to reduce choppiness you raised the priority of speech > dispatcher and lowered the priority of speechd-up. Does your solution > work better? Feel free to explain. > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup - -- web site: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org gpg public key: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org/pubkey.asc skype: gregn1 (authorization required, add me to your contacts list first) - -- Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEEIyR7s9z/XlyUyARAkP5AJ923CSw7uLckpAaciK8AIfItMJ8TgCffN5W gDrv5oyQwBZK2na1HKKNMZs= =PUlm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
