Its a problem, US and UK pronounciations. For me it is the reverse of the problem below, normally synths are US based, and I am in the UK. I actually get quite annoyed by those US pronounciations, and that is another thing that makes espeak good for me. Probably the only solution that will make all happy about this is to have two seperate languages e.g. enuk and enus. From Michael Whapples Jonathan Duddington writes: > In article <200608230838.01351.garycramblitt at comcast.net>, > Gary Cramblitt <garycramblitt at comcast.net> wrote: > >> I live in U.S. When I was in grade school, I was taught that >> inserting "and" into whole numbers is incorrect, especially when >> speaking money (or writing checks). "and" should be used in place >> of the decimal point. $168.12 should be spoken "one hundred sixty >> eight dollars and twelve cents". > > Interesting. It must be an American thing then :-) > > How should "102", "112", "1002", and "1023" be spoken? Do any of those > include an "and"? > > I actually say 168 as "a hundred 'n sixty-eight" with a "'n" (syllablic > n) sound rather than "and". I could make that change as a compromise. > > Here, cheques (which I think are equivalent to your "checks") are > written as "One hundred and sixty eight". > > Of course, for an American, there'll be quite a few words with "wrong" > pronunciation. Is that annoying? If anyone wants to make a list of > alternative rules and exceptions for US pronunciations for the > en_rules and en_list files, then I could mark them as "conditional" > rules and exceptions which could be activated by an attribute in a > voice file. It would be quite a big job to do it thoroughly. > > That wouldn't give them American vowels and "r" and "t" sounds (which > is a different problem), but you could have tomato as "tomayto" instead > of "tomarto". > > > >
