-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 I personally have had extremely poor results with links (the chain) and found their javascript support to be practically nonexistant. Now elinks, on the other hand, has done me quite well. The only two things I've been annoyed with so far is the "harmless buttons" often seen where normal buttons would be rendored in Firefox or IE. The other is I turn on numbered links but for some reason, navigating to them is sometimes out of sequence. It's almost like the page is divided up into sections and the arrow keys caus a section to be skipped over and picked up later in the sequence. If you use the numbers directly in those circomstances, you will end up activating the wrong links. Asside from those, I still like elinks much better than links and I have pretty much stopped using lynx (the cat) entirely and will probably be removing it from my system shortly. On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:16:01PM -0400, Karen Lewellen wrote: > listers, > of the two or as far as I understand it two javascript browser options, > Links, and e-links, whose javascript support is strongest? > we have links on shellworld, and i have found it works sometimes and > sometimes not on the same website. > > we also have e-links, which looks confusing at fi first, but maybe i > should read the man or help files if I can find them. thanks, > Karen > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > - -- HolmesGrown Solutions The best solutions for the best price! http://ld.net/?holmesgrown -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDQtcYWSjv55S0LfERA3tjAJsFHPHl4te5vOrCPRW0NzPmUsslewCeIngg dDOxwJXGHMauQCWESJzM0Xc= =gdcR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
