Personally, I think you all took Sina the wrong way. You lot seem to be overlooking his/her point completely. He/she was looking for information. Simply that. Searching for information. Knowledge. To be educated. Not for when such a project can be done or who will do it. I understood your point entirely, Sina. At 06:12 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote: >Naaaaa, Gene's message was not imature or any such thing, I think you >missed the point and didn't read the entire message. What he was >saying in a much longer version than I would have is this. > >You want it, find someone or do it yourself. If Kirk or anyone else >wanted to do this, you bet it would have been done. >So, there's the short version. Its possible, but no one is interested >in doing it. I think that sums it up real nice. Gee I think Gene said >it nicer than I. >Btw, I think Gene was quite adult about the entire message her wrote, >I think you simply took it the wrong way. > > >On Oct 3, 2005, at 1:02 AM, Sina Bahram wrote: > >>Hi Gene, >> >>I have asked a ligitamet question for the purpose of knowledge and >>open >>discussion ... A wonderful bit of which has happened already. >> >>Yet I receive this email from you that wishes to accuse. Frankly, I >>don't >>have time to ask loaded questions, so if I'm asking, it means I >>want to >>know. >> >>I'm sending another email with my answers inline, but I find it >>quite sad >>that you have sent such an immature response to a ligitamet >>question that >>the rest of us are discussing like adults. >> >>Take care, >>Sina > > >_______________________________________________ >Speakup mailing list >Speakup at braille.uwo.ca >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
