Hi.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 05:34:12PM -0500, Janina Sajka wrote:
> Is 90 or 95 per cent close enough to all? If not, I don't understand
> your recalcitrance at all. I would expect most users would consider this
> a distinction without a meaningful difference. Therefore, you're not
> being fully forthcoming.
Could you please explain where you come up with 90 or 95 percent?
Kenny
