I have told you all I know, and all I really care to know about Fedora numbering. As I said in my last message, I really don't give a damm about the subject. My only interest, as I said in the first instance, is that the information posted regarding the Speakup Modified is accurate and reliable. I will not hesitate to respond forcefully on that account, and I also don't care whether you regard my response as aggressive or whatever. Adrian Beech writes: > G'day, > > Okay I'm probably adding fuel to the fire... I'm fairly new to the FC > variant and have been mildly baffled by the the naming conventione employed > by the keepers of the code base and I'd really like a much more definitive > explaination, if possible, as to when a duck is not a duck. Surely Janina > if you know the answers which support the reasonings then perhaps you could > enlighten us all instead of, ummmmm, hmmmmm, ummmmm... being (and don't take > this the wrong way) aggressive in your tone and attitude. If you don't know > the where and why fores just say so, huh? > > My sincere apologies to all if this response is seen as to be inflammatory > in nature. It is not my intention to persist the present tones which seem > to be evolving from this thread. I too merely seek a response that makes > sense and is one that I can understand.
