-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I find it interesting that you are demanding an explanation for something that is obvious to me at least, when you yourself failed to give an explanation a while back to someone on here who wanted to know something or other (I don't remember what now, though it's in the list archives), about a fedora naming convention that was not obvious to him and a few others, while it seemed from your posts that it was perfectly obvious to you, and that you weren't going to discuss it anymore for that, or maybe some other reason. So, if you're going to play, how about playing fair? Greg On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 07:09:08PM -0400, Janina Sajka wrote: > No, not until you explain why that's important to mention when it's not > important to mention several other things she left out. You know that's > insufficient context to place the question don't you? So, splain > yourself. > - -- web site: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org gpg public key: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org/pubkey.asc skype: gregn1 (authorization required, add me to your contacts list first) - -- Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC4uSR7s9z/XlyUyARAjTMAKCS9fuUuWuPC4Bd0fpXYkiGkly0QQCfbL40 lXyPgtRocKEqCrDO6yreMzM= =qh5t -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
