Someone will undoubtedly correct me about this, zip does not compress
music files more then they are already compressed. Zip is a loss-less
compression format. All your data could be there. Yes in answer to your
question, there are methods which have been suggested which will meet your
goals and not compress your data.
Karen Lewellen <klewellen at shellworld.net>
Sent by: speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca
09/27/2004 04:21 PM
Please respond to "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
cc:
Subject: Re: Linux and data storage?
Much of this is music materials and the like which do not compress well
when using those programs as I have tried.
I do not want to chance it.
Call me a chicken if you wish but it is my data. Will the methods
suggested do this, no compression involved?
Karen
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Luke Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>
>> I have no intention of risking a zip of any of these files, nor do i
want
>> to
>
> Risking a zip? What does that mean? Where is the risk? Gnu Zip (not
PK
> Zip), and Bzip2, are highly stable formats.
> Tar is an archiving method used for decades on unix. In fact, Linux
uses
> bzip2 as its kernel format these days.
>
> This exact method is how many of us who backup shellworld user data, do
it,
> on a regular basis--tar archived into bzip, or gzip.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
