-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hmm. I tried the <escape>P command and then tried re-opening the message to see if the signature would verify...I havne't actually gotten anyone's signature to propperly verify. Gpg gives me a message that states that the signature could not be verified, that the public key was not found. However, before that Mutt tells me that a certain was not found...From the way Dectalk pronounces it, I am guessing the program is called gpgswrap or something like that. Anyone know what I am missing here? Thanks! On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 07:31:53AM -0700, Steve Holmes wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:58:06PM -0600, Gregory Nowak wrote: > > Looks good, and your key imported just fine. From what I understand, > > it is a good idea to use the traditional signatures anyway, since some > > mailers don't support the newer pgp/mime format from what I've been > > told. > > From the language of what I've read so far, it sounds like these other > mailers better get hoppin! When I see phrases like "strongly > deprecated" and the like, it makes me think that inline signatures are > rather undesirable and should only be used when nothing else works. I > set the 'quad option' of the pgp_create_traditional variable to ask-no > so I get prompted each time and can answer 'y' for the lists but use > the other default for private stuff. > > -- > HolmesGrown Solutions > The best solutions for the best price! > http://ld.net/?holmesgrown > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAYxuBNohoaf1zXJMRAvNnAJ0ZHnDpIdBGh4ZNmUsZWDmXkIStSQCeLcIh xLse7MqZ+YCq0QTDR2X8bJI= =qdJx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
