-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:58:06PM -0600, Gregory Nowak wrote: > Looks good, and your key imported just fine. From what I understand, > it is a good idea to use the traditional signatures anyway, since some > mailers don't support the newer pgp/mime format from what I've been > told. - From the language of what I've read so far, it sounds like these other mailers better get hoppin! When I see phrases like "strongly deprecated" and the like, it makes me think that inline signatures are rather undesirable and should only be used when nothing else works. I set the 'quad option' of the pgp_create_traditional variable to ask-no so I get prompted each time and can answer 'y' for the lists but use the other default for private stuff. - -- HolmesGrown Solutions The best solutions for the best price! http://ld.net/?holmesgrown -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAYu1WWSjv55S0LfERAlO4AKDKqStC3zMbrQ5KDkm6+yFKgEJcQgCg8SZx Jf6e5JQrxmeJoAJlgN1rk4g= =Cvzn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
