-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:04:00PM +0200, Hynek Hanke wrote: > It just says that if you don't want to bother you with including the > full license (because of it's lenght), you can use a much simpler > license for such small code and it's still ok with FSF ethics. It > doesn't say that you have to do so or that you should do so. There is > no such requirement in GPL. > > So if you think your program is valuable or it might grow in the > future or whatever, it's perfectly ok to use GNU GPL. The size of your > package will double (since you have to include the full text of GNU > GPL into it), but if you don't mind, there is no problem. > Ok, thanks. That's what I wasn't sure about. Greg - -- Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA0GXM7s9z/XlyUyARAmBeAJ9lnYQ4r3k3WktL8I+H8TdsLf8NmwCg2tzX mJbRPbNH4Pt1v1nINcQly3o= =MbHH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
