I'm more comfertable with make config myself, because make menuconfig tends to select certain things by default and you might not want, so you have to go into menus youwouldn't normally touch and say no. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregory Nowak" <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup at braille.uwo.ca> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:01 PM Subject: Re: Compiling my kernel > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I think that's a matter of personal preference. I personally am more > comfortable with make config, rather then with make menuconfig. > > Greg > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 05:27:45PM -0400, Alex Snow wrote: > > When compiling a kernel you're best bet is to use make menuconfig. It > > presents everything in menus making it much easier then make config (which > > is a great way to give yourself a headake rather quickly). > > > > - -- > Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFAyNpP7s9z/XlyUyARAr1UAKCWlqzZAWXpl3HAafR0AF4yizYAjACeKRPM > kMNoro5+bbLJ4EGHz1TDaeE= > =c0Y9 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
