pgp problem still not solved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Actually, I think I figured out what the problem is...It appears that
Shaun has set pgp_outlook_compat=yes in one of his muttrcs, however when
I try setting it in my .muttrc file Mutt complains that
pgp_outlook_compat is an unknown variable. We appear to be using the
same version of Mutt (1.3.28I). Was their a patch or something released
that adds this variable? 
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 05:32:05AM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Igor,
> 
> I have stayed out of this discussion since I have had no
> experience with mutt. However, it sounds to me like you ought to
> check into the gnupg support list with that problem. It is an
> active list on which many people use signed messages, and nearly
> half of those are signed using the inline method. That method may
> be depricated, but it is still in wide use. In fact one of the
> developers is offering a script for pine users to beta test. He
> claims it is superior to the various pgp4pine packages out there,
> and that script only supports inline signatures. He claims that
> pine cannot handle attached signatures at the present time.
> 
> I am sure those folks can help you get a handle on what is
> happening.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> 
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Igor Gueths wrote:
> 
> > Hi all. My problem with Mutt/inline PGP signatures remains unsolved.
> > Shaun Oliver and I traded configs and didn't get anywhere, except to
> > learn the fact that our configurations perfectly matched in terms of
> > commands being passed to gpg. I tried downgrading from Mutt-1.4.2 to
> > Mutt-1.3.28I and still got the same results. Could the version of Gnupg
> > that I'm using have something to do with the problem? I've been
> > currently using Gnupg-1.2.2, and I've read everywhere in the Mutt docs
> > that the old-style PGP signatures i.e., SHA1 are strongly deprecated.
> > Does anyone have any other ideas regarding this, or am I pretty much
> > correct in my assumptions? Because considering I am doing everything
> > right, I'm running out of possibilities as to what the problem is.
> > Thanks!
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> 
> - -- 
> The Moon is Waning Crescent (40% of Full)
> In a world without Fences or Walls no one needs Windows or Gates.
> My home page is now at http://www.mhcable.com/~chuckh
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iQCVAwUBQC35MTVdG8M9x9tGAQIlIgP/d0s5pm6iX/PZYkNpMTmNTLImdRxjUtBf
> mEsSk+XPDv+qBBBx7b7d/vEbVIc8pcrgeG8zKhKr3IBJF/Mtcp/SD0ZXlbN4BeCg
> LJp/dH+B1B2XLwrNjh7qVSJ2T9xRNY3Mu51MlTmkWdwI3N7bEE/aDkCsFjJyEPlS
> CARsOTGYfj8=
> =2aNs
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup




[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux