-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Igor, >From a message on the gnupg users list: http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users HTH Chuck On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Igor Gueths wrote: > Hi all. My problem with Mutt/inline PGP signatures remains unsolved. > Shaun Oliver and I traded configs and didn't get anywhere, except to > learn the fact that our configurations perfectly matched in terms of > commands being passed to gpg. I tried downgrading from Mutt-1.4.2 to > Mutt-1.3.28I and still got the same results. Could the version of Gnupg > that I'm using have something to do with the problem? I've been > currently using Gnupg-1.2.2, and I've read everywhere in the Mutt docs > that the old-style PGP signatures i.e., SHA1 are strongly deprecated. > Does anyone have any other ideas regarding this, or am I pretty much > correct in my assumptions? Because considering I am doing everything > right, I'm running out of possibilities as to what the problem is. > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > - -- The Moon is Waning Crescent (40% of Full) In a world without Fences or Walls no one needs Windows or Gates. My home page is now at http://www.mhcable.com/~chuckh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBQC36KjVdG8M9x9tGAQJNpwP/dyB2D9wdpO3H5btYLsrV1rHj5bhzXZ5A utL9coIL58JvIQuNOxLLw63ISCGdPSu2ktyIKKKZyy3HlBxjmRd2/xBMxFnph9Qg Rhf6LS4/wzwkNC9n7sKgiyaMhLkUzKeaHpDDVkGI7XIqHDfkusm+FcFIO6zafFK4 r641ZT0HBuA= =NWzb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
