Hi, This exchange brings up a question. Granted, there are no absolutes here, since each user has his own goals for Linux, and such personal computing should be respected. It is in fact just what Microsoft seeks to remove from computing "personal," still given the many distributions of Linux, which is best for working with speakup, pros and cons if there is more than one? Thanks, Karen On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, David Csercsics wrote: > >Snip: > >"You do not need a GUI in Linux so don't waste the time with Gnome as > >your effort to make it work will NOT be rewarded" > >Reply: > >On the contrary I use gnopernicus for a great many tasks and with Gnome 2.6 > >and Gnopernicus 0.8.4 functionally operating you can use gedit if you like a > >Windows-like text editor like I do, use file roller to unpack archives, > >balsa for sending/recieving email, gnome-cd for playing music cds, > >gnome-volume for controling volume, and a handfull of other apps including > >Openoffice on a daily basis. > >Point here, while gnopernicus has a long ways to go there is many things it > >can be used for on a daily basis. Weather every end user of the software > >has the same needs or uses it for those kinds of apps depends on the user > >and is subjective. However, saying that it can not be used on a daily basis > >is off base. > > OK well I guess I stand corrected then. > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >
