I believe you only have to make source available if you modify and distribute the MPL files. Unlike GPL, MPL is on a file by file basis. It's not at all improbable for FreedomBox to have been coded without modifying core files -- just by writing components that use the current APIs. - Aaron Igor Gueths wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >I am going to mail support at freedombox.info and see what has to be said >on the subject. >On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 09:05:00AM -0400, Whitley CTR Cecil H wrote: > > >>Hi, >>You may wish to talk with the company prior to making an issue of it. It is >>possible that other licensing arrangements have been made with the copyright >>holder(s). >>Regards, >>Cecil >>_______________________________________________ >>Speakup mailing list >>Speakup at braille.uwo.ca >>http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >> >> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > >iD8DBQFAdqF3Nohoaf1zXJMRAhILAJ9eWtwG0IWc/zUKmNK2fzB9LqHvTgCgmCK5 >WAR/8C4+eUy4KIL4d3SwqT8= >=PC1Z >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >_______________________________________________ >Speakup mailing list >Speakup at braille.uwo.ca >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > >
