2.4.22

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've been using it here with no problems.
2GHZ AMD with 512 meg ram 40 gig hd.

          Kenny
	  
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:13:26AM +0000, Luke Davis wrote:
> Does anyone else hold this opinion (that 2.4.22 is crap)?  I am in the
> processof compiling it on a live commercial server, and would like
> opinions of this.
> 
> Luke
>  On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> 
> > Hi all.
> >
> > The subject says it all. I went back to linux 2.4.21, and the box
> > works like a charm. No segmentation faults, no inactivity for long
> > periods, it's all gone.
> >
> > Thanks to all who provided suggestions/help, but in the end it turned
> > out that 2.4.22 is a piece of crap.
> > That's my personal opinion, which I have the right to state, so no
> > flames please.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup




[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux