I used oggenc and a level of 7 or 9 and can't remember. I have to say that for my purposes and I am serious about listening, I do not find OGG sufficiently compelling to use it. I suppose if I had started with OGG rather than MP3 then I might have a different view. Converting all that stuff all over agian would be a royal pain. Grin. On Thu, 22 May 2003, Cheryl Homiak wrote: > To any and all who have had a good amount of experience converting music CDs to > ogg files: > Do you have an oppinion on the quality level that should be used in converting > music CDs? Of course, the higher the quality level you choose, the bigger the > file; on the other hand, one doesn't want to make poor quality files just to > save as much space as possible. I'm satisfied with '-q 0" for most reading > material,files, but am thinking that perhaps i should use at least the default "-q 3" or > maybe higher for my music despite the increase in size. > Since they are just for my own use I don't need to be ultraprofessional, but i > don't want to be sloppy either. > Thanks. > > Cheryl > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > -- -- Charlie Crawford
