true, and mozilla and netscape adhere to standards much better the ie. -- A message from the system administrator: "I've upped my priority, now up yours!" On Wed, 14 May 2003, Lorenzo Prince wrote: > I would send an email to the webmaster telling him/her to go f**k > Microsoft. Why do they say Microsoft anyway, as Netscape and Mozilla both > support frames and actually both work much better and more securely than > IE, which has so many holes in it that Bill Gates could get sucked into it > without even trying. I'm surprised he hasn't already. LOL. > > Lorenzo > > On a normal ascii line, the only safe condition to detect is a 'BREAK' > - everything else having been assigned functions by Gnu EMACS. > -- Tarl Neustaedter > > Chuck Hallenbeck staggered into view and mumbled: > > > Here is a snip from a web site I recently visited: > > > > ----- > > > > You Need Frames > > > > Any self-respecting person has a frames-capable browser. Go > > get one > > from [3]Microsoft and then come back. > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > How about that for due? > > > > -- > > The Moon is Waxing Gibbous (98% of Full) > > So visit me sometime at http://www.mhonline.net/~chuckh > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >
