Hi. I think the shows on gnopernicus could be the best thing to make it
usable sooner. When the shows started, few people had it working. Now,
more people have at least got it talking as well as the demos on the
Main Menu show. True, it doesn't give the access of a current Windows
screen reader, but it gives enough for people used to testing and fixing
to get started.
Kenny
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 06:01:07PM -0400, Alex Snow wrote:
> In my opinion this gnome review could've waited another 6 monts at least.
> until gnopernicus is a little farther along in development and a viable
> alternative to winblows.
>
> --
> A message from the system administrator: "I've upped my priority, now up yours!"
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Adam Myrow wrote:
>
> > It's there now. I must say that of all the segments, this was the most
> > disappointing, but I appreciate the honesty of it. The truth is evident
> > from the segment. Mozilla is far from ready for serious use. The Balsa
> > email client looked almost there, but I have never before heard of it.
> > Anybody else know about it? Is it part of Gnome? For now, I'm sticking
> > with Lynx and Pine. I've been using those programs since 1995 in the
> > command-line environment, and it's kind of hard to change.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
