Try one of the later pres, such as 11. The support, I believe, was better in 9 on out. On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Steve Holmes wrote: > I'm using version 2.1pre7 and yes, the java support was specified when > I compiled from the tar ball source. I don't remember the exact > options now but I also enabled the related stuff in the configuration > for the run time of the browser. Maybe it works on certain pages but > for me I have had almost zero success. I sometimes like the layout it > does and I also like the frames being shown all at once but javascript > well.... I think that will have to wait before it is useful for me. > > On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 11:49:36AM -0500, Luke Davis wrote: > > Note: I speak only of the chain and its varients, in this message... > > > > Are you sure you weren't using elinks? Under Debian, for example, > > installing "links", will get you "elinks", which is a branch of the main > > links package, with no JS support. > > > > I have used links with success on many javascript sites. > > > > It can not handle non SDM scripts, so it's mainly good for JS forms, > > links, buttons, and option lists, but for those things, it does in fact > > work. > > > > When did you do this test, and what was the version you used? You have to > > be using a pre. > > > > > > On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Steve Holmes wrote: > > > > > Interesting you mention the "Chain." I tried that program (most > > > recent version) and frankly I've yet to find a javascript page that > > > worked right. At least the ones I had any particular interest in. I > > > neddless to say, was very disappointed in the current level of > > > javascript support for that browser. I had tried it on a couple > > > financial sites I have access to and this php database application I > > > downloaded and setup all fell on their faces. This php tool had a > > > section that simply came up blank. So If I ever wanna use that level > > > of javascript support, I will probably have to wait for Mozilla and > > > Gnopernicus to grow up or pop over to internet exploder for the time > > > being <sigh>. > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 01:59:26PM -0400, Janina Sajka wrote: > > > > You don't need javascript to navigate a tree. There's no linkage between > > > > the two necessarily. > > > > > > > > Nor are you prevented from pages that use js on the console. Go get the > > > > chain, if you need that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > >
