Servers and Tos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



if you want uncapped bandwidth you need a business plan. charter has 
an uncapped plan but they charge you through the ass for it.
they did rais the cap on their residential services to 2 mb down for 
the time being but they still block ports. even If they didn't block 
them I'd still run servers. they're too stupid to find them and they 
probably don't even no what a server is. or even a computer
On 
Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:26:27PM -0600, Vortek, Eater Of Souls! wrote:
> yes, that's assuming that the cable company allows their users to share
> their total bandwidth...which roadrunner doesn't.
> They cap you at...well, when I had it it was 1.5mbps down, and 384kbps
> up.
> yes, I know a lot of other cable companies allow their users to suck
> every last bit of speed that is available on their main lines, but rr
> doesn't, and therefore, if they try and enforce something like a policy
> on running servers, I don't see where they'd be coming from.
> if a company allowed you to use all available bandwidth, then I could
> understand, but very few cable companies do that any
> more...unfortunately. :)
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup

-- 
Always borrow money from a pessimist; he doesn't expect to be paid
back.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux