Luke Davis writes: > From: Luke Davis <ldavis at shellworld.net> > > On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Janina Sajka wrote: > > > Luke Davis writes: False. There is no evidence of any deliberation, nor of any decision. There is certainly evidence that special accomodations were not allowed. I would certainly agree that they should haave been allowed. That would constitute a reasonable accomodation and thus be more likely to equalize the opportunity. But, that isn't the same as people sitting down to say "let's stick it to this person." That's what "deliberately deny" means. Did they deny equal access? Arguably so, by virtue of not making reasonable and appropriate accomodations. Was that a "deliberate decision to deny?" Bull.. Ignorance and lack of consideration? Yes. "Deliberate decision to deny." Hardly. Or, perhaps you're privvy to some smoking memo? Or the meeting agenda where this deliberate decision was reached? So, thaat's one supposed fact in question. You did say "facts," as in the plural. So, what else > > > > "I have not investigated, and do not intend to investigate, the facts he > > listed." > > > > Facts? What facts? There were no "facts" in that post, just allegations. > > Rather outrageous ones, too. > > Regarding: > > > Some will recall that Red Hat recently decided to deliberately deny > > equal access to its training material as offered to those whom decide to > > take their week-long RHCE training classes. Oh, well... > > Is this false? Did they, or did they not, make these inaccessible? > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup -- Janina Sajka, Director Technology Research and Development Governmental Relations Group American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) Email: janina at afb.net Phone: (202) 408-8175
