Syslinux is very light-weight, and is easier to setup then lilo. However, if you want a boot loader for your hd, lilo or grub is it. Syslinux is only good for floppies for example. Greg On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 09:12:53PM -0700, Steve Holmes wrote: > I faintly recall some discussion on this subject before on this list > but I can't remember the outcome of it. What are the pros and cons of > using syslinux instead of lilo? I've used lilo for years without any > real problems. I'm looking into Debian and I notice the boot disks > have syslinux on them but the write ups for Debian imply that lilo is > the official boot loader so I'm a tad confused at the moment:). > > Any ideas? > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
