Well in her case she only has two machines I think a laptop and desktop. She could just statically assign her ips and put them in the iptable. And use her isp for dns Explorer has caused a general protection fault in module kernel32.dll. I'm sick of Winblows! On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Janina Sajka wrote: > You're correct, Jim, static is better. Only if you have many > machines coming and going is dhcp an improvement. > > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 jwantz at hpcc2.hpcc.noaa.gov wrote: > > > Yes, Janina that is why I suggested she use ifconfig and route for her > > static stuff. I'm not sure why anybody would want to use dhcp on the > > inside of a network (unless the machines inside are WINDOWS).On Sun, 30 > > Jun 2002, Janina Sajka wrote: > > > > > I may be wrong about this, but I think those Red Hat utilities > > > only work for one card and simple setups. When you move to two > > > nics and ip forwarding/masquerading, you leave simple behind and > > > the scripts won't help you anymore. After all, Linux is very > > > powerful on networking, and the scripts aren't designed to cover > > > all circumstances, only the basics for newbies and technophobes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > -- > > Janina Sajka, Director > Technology Research and Development > Governmental Relations Group > American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) > > Email: janina at afb.net Phone: (202) 408-8175 > > Chair, Accessibility SIG > Open Electronic Book Forum (OEBF) > http://www.openebook.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >
