question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Greg. The driver could be loading at boot time. In fact, it mentions eth0 when it successuflly probes for the card and mac address. However, when I log in and check /dev to make sure that eth0 is in fact there, I get the following: ls: eth0: no such file or directory. Does this mean that the card didn't properly initialize into a device file? How could I fix this? Thanks in advance! 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Gregory Nowak <gnowak1@xxxxxxx>
To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: question


> Yes, your driver is in the kernel. Also, based on your previous post that says that the kernel lists all the info about the card, the driver is in fact loading.
> Greg
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 10:05:35AM -0500, Igor Gueths wrote:
> > Hi. Well interestingly enough, when I do a lsmod, there are no modules listed. But when the kernel is booting, it tells me the driver version and all the information regarding the card itself such as mac address. So I believe that this means that the driver is in the kernel? I believe this is so, however for some reason the tulip driver might not be loading? 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: Georgina <gena at gena-j.net>
> > To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 9:56 AM
> > Subject: Re: question 
> > 
> > 
> > > Hi
> > > 
> > > Sorry forgot try "man interfaces"
> > > 
> > > Gena
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >Hi all. I finally got my kernel to boot, and after doing a make =
> > > >oldconfig and editing .config to answer y to tulip support, the kernel =
> > > >boots. It probes my ethernet card and calls it eth0. It also displays =
> > > >its mac address and finds it on irq 10. However, the problem is that =
> > > >when I check dev to make sure eth0 is present, it isn't there. Why would =
> > > >the device not be initialized into a device file if it was probed =
> > > >successfully? This doesn't really make sense to me, considering that =
> > > >everything went ok. And naturally, I couldn't do ifconfig dhcp because =
> > > >it didn't find the network interface? How could I go about fixing this =
> > > >problem? Thanks in advance!=20
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >_________________________________________________________
> > > >Do You Yahoo!?
> > > >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >Speakup mailing list
> > > >Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux